Weigeren zonder effect
Weigeren verandert niet wat de browser verlaat.
- Familie
- Toestemming
- Status
- actief
- Geldt voor
- web
Wat er gebeurt
The site asks for consent and registers the refusal, but the tags that the refusal should stop do not sit behind the gate. The screen confirms the choice; the wire shows the same traffic as before.
Waarom het ertoe doet
A refusal that changes nothing makes the right to withhold and to withdraw consent a formality. The visitor believes they have decided something and they have not.
Veelvoorkomende oorzaken
- tags hardcoded rather than gated
- consent tool blocks cookies but not the loading of scripts or containers
- banner is informational and wired to nothing
Dit is het níet
If nothing was asked before the tag fired, that is Tracking before consent. If no refusal option is offered at all, that is No refusal option.
Hoe je het vaststelt
Indicator
Set comparison: the third-party hosts contacted after an explicitly registered refusal are equal to, or a superset of, those contacted without any interaction. There is no third reading.
Methode
differential
Kwaliteit van de detectie
97 van 100
De grenzen van deze bevinding
Wat dit patroon zou weerleggen
- The refusal was not registered.machinaal te toetsende bevinding vervaltThe most important one: it turns a finding into a measurement error.
- The banner does block, but later than the capture window.machinaal te toetsende bevinding vervalt
- The surviving requests are strictly necessary for a service the visitor asked for.niet uit de meting af te leidende bevinding krijgt een ander patroonA judgement per host. Never excluded automatically; an entry may be cited with this untested as long as that is stated.
Wat dit patroon níet vaststelt
- harm; the catalogue standardises a finding so it can be referred to, it does not weigh it
- severity; there is no score here, by design. Weighing belongs to whoever applies the entry to a concrete case
- unlawfulness; that is for a supervisory authority or a court
- intent; a fault is usually a build decision, not a plan
- absence: not finding it in one capture is not evidence that it is not there
Reproduceren
- manual
METHOD.mdno dedicated reproduction exists yet; follow the general method and the indicator above - script
repro/web/check.mjsthe run reports DPE-2026-0002 as present, with the detail behind it
Ook zichtbaar met openbare scanners
Juridisch kader
Bepalingen
Rechtspraak
Veelgehoorde tegenwerpingen
The banner is there, so the visitor has a choice.
The choice exists on screen and not on the wire. Consent requires an active act of the user; an act without effect is not such an act.
This is analytics, which needs no consent.
Then the banner should not have listed it, and there would be no refusal to honour. A party cannot both treat something as consent-bound and ignore the refusal.
Geldt wanneer
to-processing
Aangetroffen in
De onderzoeken waarin dit patroon gemeten is.
Verwante patronen
- DPE-2026-0001Meten voor de toestemmingsvraag
- DPE-2026-0003Geen weigeroptie
- DPE-2026-0004Maximale cookielevensduur voor de vraag
- DPE-2026-0014Geen werkende uitschakeling
- DPE-2026-0019Bijzondere gegevens in een gebeurtenis
- DPE-2026-0021Aftasten van het apparaat van de bezoeker
- DPE-2026-0040Betalen of accepteren als enige keuze
- DPE-2026-0044Ongelijk vormgegeven toestemmingskeuze