DPE-2026-0039

Examentoezicht met gedragsscores

Examensoftware kijkt naar lichaam, geluid en scherm, en houdt per student een verdenkingsregistratie over na de uitslag.

Familie
Gegevens
Status
actief
Geldt voor
web, desktop, mobile-app

Wat er gebeurt

During an examination the software watches through the camera and the microphone and over the screen: face position, gaze direction, a second face in the frame, sound in the room, windows opened, typing rhythm. From that it derives flags or a score for each student. The recording and the derived judgement are stored, reviewed by staff or by the supplier, and kept after the examination has been graded. An identity step by face comparison often precedes it.

Waarom het ertoe doet

The student sits at home and cannot decline without failing the course. What is recorded includes the room, the people in it and the sounds of a household. A score derived from body movement is a judgement about a person that the person has to argue against, produced by a system that does not explain itself, and where a face is compared the processing is biometric identification.

Veelvoorkomende oorzaken

  • a supplier product with flagging enabled as delivered
  • recordings kept for the appeal period for every student rather than for the flagged ones
  • the identity step performed by face comparison because the alternative requires staff
  • flags treated as evidence rather than as a prompt for a human to look

Dit is het níet

Recording a website session is Session recording. Recognising everyone who passes a camera is Recognition of every passer-by, where the setting is a public space. This entry is about a compulsory examination: the observation concerns one identified student, it produces a judgement about that student, and it outlives the result.

Hoe je het vaststelt

Indicator

After the mark is final, records about individual students still exist: the recording, the derived flags, or a score. Establish it from the institution's retention schedule for this system, from the supplier's export, or from a student's access request that returns their own flags, and distinguish the three.

Methode

document-comparison

Kwaliteit van de detectie

85 van 100

De grenzen van deze bevinding

Wat dit patroon zou weerleggen

  • Nothing per student survives grading except the mark itself.met de hand te toetsende bevinding vervalt
  • A human invigilator watched live and nothing was recorded or scored.met de hand te toetsende bevinding vervalt
  • Only sessions a human flagged are kept, with a stated ground and an end date.met de hand te toetsende bevinding wordt zwakker
  • A genuine alternative was available in the same period, without a penalty and without a separate fee.met de hand te toetsende bevinding wordt zwakkerThe compulsion argument then falls. The observation itself still has to be necessary for the purpose.

Wat dit patroon níet vaststelt

  • harm; the catalogue standardises a finding so it can be referred to, it does not weigh it
  • severity; there is no score here, by design. Weighing belongs to whoever applies the entry to a concrete case
  • unlawfulness; that is for a supervisory authority or a court
  • intent; a fault is usually a build decision, not a plan
  • absence: not finding it in one capture is not evidence that it is not there

Reproduceren

  • manualMETHOD.mdno dedicated reproduction exists yet; follow the general method and the indicator above

Juridisch kader

Bepalingen

eu-gdpr-5-1-ceu-gdpr-5-1-eeu-gdpr-22eu-gdpr-9-1

Veelgehoorde tegenwerpingen

The student agreed to the examination conditions.

Agreeing under threat of not graduating is not free consent, which is why examinations run on a public task or a contract and have to satisfy necessity instead.

The system does not decide, a person does.

Where that person sees only the flags the system produced, the system did the selecting. What has to be shown is what the reviewer had in front of them besides the score.

The camera image is deleted immediately.

Then the flags derived from it are the record, and the question moves to them. Ask what remains, not what is deleted.

Fraud has to be prevented.

It does, and that is a purpose. It does not settle the interval, the room, the retention or the score, each of which is a separate choice that can be made differently.

Geldt wanneer

to-processing

Verwante patronen

← alle patronen